<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One to Watch &#8211; The White Ribbon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wherethelongtailends.com/archives/one-to-watch-the-white-ribbon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wherethelongtailends.com/archives/one-to-watch-the-white-ribbon</link>
	<description>Watching what no one else does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://wherethelongtailends.com/archives/one-to-watch-the-white-ribbon/comment-page-1#comment-3269</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherethelongtailends.com/?p=2803#comment-3269</guid>
		<description>Certainly a quality film.  This is one that I really REALLY appreciated at the TIFF screening.  It&#039;s not the most entertaining of films, but intriguing nonetheless.  I really can&#039;t wait to revisit.  It is in the top 3 of most beautiful films of the year to be sure; despite (or because) it being in B&amp;W.  It&#039;s like a moving Ansel Adams photo.

But again, requires a second viewing for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly a quality film.  This is one that I really REALLY appreciated at the TIFF screening.  It&#8217;s not the most entertaining of films, but intriguing nonetheless.  I really can&#8217;t wait to revisit.  It is in the top 3 of most beautiful films of the year to be sure; despite (or because) it being in B&amp;W.  It&#8217;s like a moving Ansel Adams photo.</p>
<p>But again, requires a second viewing for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
