stats count

Since it’s Halloween, I figured it would be fun to take a look at some of the moments that have scared, frightened and unnerved me, either in a book or a movie. We’ll be looking at two short stories, two novels, and some movies. Let’s get started.

“BEST NEW HORROR”

I’ll start with this one since I’ve mentioned this short story by Joe Hill once or twice already, and I’ll try not to repeat myself too much here. ”Best New Horror” is the story of a jaded horror editor who receives a terrifying short story submission that renews his faith in horror stories. The editor’s interest in the story leads him to seek out the author, a meeting that fans of horror will see coming a mile away, followed by a twist they won’t.

What interests me with “Best New Horror” is the horror story within the horror story, where Hill is careful to turn up the meta. Now, the casual writer would be smart enough not to tell the story that the editor gets so excited about and leave it up to the readers’ imagination; however, Hill is confident enough reveal the entire story from beginning to end with successful results. It’s a harrowing story, one that is strangely heartbreaking as well. It’s also a story that could easily stand on its own, which is probably why the editor’s framing story works too.

If you appreciate an interesting take on why people are attracted to horror fiction, then this is the story for you. Though, if you have issues with pins and eyelids…this might not be your thing.


HOUSE OF LEAVES

I’m going to brief about this as I’ve been working on a long piece regarding Mark Z. Danielewski’s 1999 novel for a few months now. Hell, my Master’s project was about House of Leaves. It is, I feel, one of the most important books published in the last 20 years. But this is something I recognize now, having spent years absorbing the book. Back when I first bought it, it was simply this new horror book I kept hearing about. I had read a review about it in USA Today when I was visiting Houston, and when my plane landed in Buffalo a few days later, the first thing I did after checking into my hotel room was go to the bookstore to buy this book. It completely fucked up my week. And a lot of it had to do with the fact that I ended up reading it three times in a row. The only book I’ve ever done that with.

To put it simply, House of Leaves tells the story of Will Navidson, a famous photographer, who moves into an undisclosed house with his partner Karen Green and their two children. It is discovered that the house is bigger on the inside than it is on the outside, with doors appearing where there were none before, revealing unlit hallways and passageways that appear to go on forever. With the help of his brother and colleagues, Navidson decides to explore the newly discovered interior of the house. And then it all goes to hell.

If you pick up a copy of the book and flip through its pages, you’re going to understand fairly quickly that the aforementioned description doesn’t do the book justice. It really is a book that needs to be seen to be believed, and what you’ll see in those pages will either turn you off completely or have you reaching for your wallet.

Now, over the years I’ve bought copies of House of Leaves as gifts for friends and family. What I’ve always loved about their reactions to the book is that nearly everyone has been spooked by it, and even better, I’ve yet to hear of people being afraid of the same thing.  

Here are two things that have always frightened me when reading House of Leaves

1) The game of “always”.

 2) Ftaires! We have found ftaires!

If you’ve read the book, then you know what I’m talking about. If you haven’t, I think it’s time you went exploring.

 

 “THE JAUNT”

Published in Stephen King’s 1985 short story collection Skeleton Crew, “The Jaunt” isn’t one of King’s best by any means, especially when put alongside other stories in the collection such “The Mist”, “Mrs. Todd’s Shortcut” and “Survivor Type”. With that said, it’s funny how when I have a discussion about Skeleton Crew, people’s eyes widen when they recall “The Jaunt”.

Most of the “The Jaunt” is the history of teleportation, or jaunting, as told by a father to his curious children as they wait to jaunt to Mars. Mostly, the material is playful, and it’s clear King is enjoying the small world building that comes with the premise. But this is King, after all. The history of jaunting has its dark moments, as it’s discovered that humans can only jaunt when they’re unconscious; those who jaunted awake died instantly or turned insane. As for the story being scary, it comes down to its ending. Once the father’s story is told, it is time for the family to undergo the sleeping gas for their jaunt. When the father wakes on Mars, he discovers to his horror that his son had held his breath when given the sleeping gas. What follows next, though brief in execution, is haunting, and stays with you long after the story is over.        

 

SONG OF KALI

Dan Simmons’ novel was a great experience for me, mostly because I didn’t expect much from the book. I hadn’t read the critiques or cared much for the awards it won; all I cared about was the pull quote on the cover about it being the scariest book ever written. And, if you are someone like me, who must buy or rent any book or movie that had such a quote on the cover only to inevitably be disappointed later…well, you stop getting your hopes up.

Luckily for me, Song of Kali is scary. The story follows an American poet who travels to Calcutta with his wife and baby to secure a poem by a poet who was believed to be dead. From there, the story enters some pretty dark territory, made easier by Simmons’ gift of making Calcutta a character in itself. If I have any reservations about traveling to Calcutta, it’s all because of this book. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if tourism there has dropped significantly since the publication of this book.

Anyway, there are two major scenes in the book to look out for. The first involves the protagonist being put into a large dark room to discover that he isn’t alone. When he finally lights a match, what he sees is chilling. And it sounds awful when I describe it like that in my attempt to avoid spoilers, but in Simmons’ hands, this scene will have you leaving a light on when you go to sleep for a night or two. And the second scene is in an airport, a scene that is as heartbreaking as it is terrifying.

To say anything more would be a disservice to the story. This book is the real deal.

 

THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT

I’m always amazed at how quickly the hate for this movie started after it was released. A lot of it had to do with the crazy hype. I remember being in Washington D.C. when it had limited screenings and the amount of people trying to get a ticket was amazing. Needless to say, I didn’t see it in D.C. Instead, I saw it alone in a theater in New Jersey, and it devestated me. Not right away. In fact, it’s safe to say I was one of the many people who stared at the screen when the lights came on and wondered if that was indeed it. But when I got home and really considered the ending…well, it wasn’t the best night to be home alone.

When it comes to the movie, it’s really all about the ending, and it’s amazing that writer-directors Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez had enough faith in the audience to connect the dots on their own. Because the true terror of The Blair Witch Project rests on your ability to choreograph the information obtained in the previous 90 minutes and fill in what the camera didn’t show you.

And fortunately for us, what they didn’t show us was pretty damn scary.

Ending of The Blair Witch Project

 

MULHOLLAND DRIVE/LOST HIGHWAY

I won’t pretend to understand David Lynch’s work as a whole. You certainly have to accept the dream-logic that permeates his movies and the ambiguity of his plots tend to leave a lot desired at times, so I can understand how his work isn’t for everyone. What has always struck me about Lynch’s movies, even when I was at a loss to what was going on, was how scary his work can be. I honestly believe that if Lynch were ever to make a full-on horror movie, most working horror filmmakers would just give up. Take for instance, Fire Walk With Me, when Bob enters Laura Palmer’s bedroom from her window, a scene so simple in execution that the uneasiness I feel when watching it is embarrassing. Or Robert Blake’s scene in Lost Highway:

Lost Highway Scene

Out of all of Lynch’s frightening moments, however, it is the diner scene in Mulholland Drive that really does it for me. Again, the premise is so simple it’s amazing it works at all, especially when you consider that the scene is shot in the day. It’s Lynch’s grasp of pacing that makes the scene’s suspense work. But there is also something strangely familiar about it as well, as if Lynch had removed a nightmare template from our collective consciousness and brought it to life. The scene is so effective that the pop-up scare at the end feels unnecessary. We’ve all been here before, and we all know what’s waiting for us at the end. 

Mulholland Drive Scene

 

CABIN OF TERROR

From what I can read online, Cabin of Terror was written by Dave Bertrand and shot over the course of 48 hours. Now, I’m writing this from memory, as the short is, sadly, no longer available to watch online. I watched it twice about a year ago, spaced apart by a week to make sure that the film’s ability upset me wasn’t a fluke. I think it’s safe to say that it bothered me more the second time. This is how the film is described online:

“In the style of the early nineties video board game “Nightmare”, our host, the Gatekeeper, leads the viewer through his twisted “Cabin of Terror”. You, the game player, must bet on the fates of three not-so-lucky female contestants, while obeying the Gatekeeper’s every command on this VHS dubbed in Hell.”

It sounds cheesy, I know. But I’d argue that watching this film gives you a brief taste of what it’s like to go insane. There is something decidedly unnatural about the short, whether it’s in its bizarre edits that work like acid flashbacks or in the way the material is so unrelenting. In many ways, this film sets out to do what Rob Zombie wanted to achieve with House of 1,000 Corpses and countless other sadistic horror movies in the last eight years, and succeeded where they couldn’t. And a large part of that is due to its length, at less than 10 minutes long, the movie doesn’t give you a single second to breathe, and when it’s over, you’re relieved instead of exhausted.

 

This is TOO SOON.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
27 Responses to “TOO SOON: Scary Moments, on the Page and on the Screen.”
  1. Marina says:

    I have only ever managed to see The Blair Witch Project once – in a cineplex on opening weekend. That movie seriously traumatized me. I hadn’t seen that closing scene since then – thanks for the link. Reminds me I should pick up a copy of this on DVD.

    And thanks too for the “House of Leaves” recommendation. Will have to take a look at this the next time I’m at the book store.

  2. Evan Derrick says:

    Just dropped “20th Century Ghosts” and “House of Leaves” into my queue at the local library. Thanks for the heads up, Christian (as always, love your column).

    I’ve never read “Song of Kali,” but I have read “The Terror,” where he hypothesizes on what happened to a lost British arctic expedition in the mid-1800s. It’s exceptional, part horror and part sci-fi. Most chilling of all, however, is the omnipresent image of crowded men, locked inside a wooden coffin (ship) in the middle of the arctic wasteland. Good read; highly recommended if you haven’t checked it out already.

  3. Andrew James says:

    Best article I’ve ever read. Seriously. You’re amazing.

    Can I come to the screening tomorrow morning?

  4. Andrew James says:

    Did I mention I really like the shirt you’re wearing right now?

  5. Matt Gamble says:

    House of Leaves is outstanding. I totally agree that “ftaires” scared the hell out of me the first time I read it. Also, the more I pondered how large the house truly was I freaked myself out and my vertigo started kicking in. Also, the side story (you know what I mean) is just downright creepy.

  6. Christian Dumais says:

    Andrew: Thanks for the kind words.

    Marina: I’m happy to know that you’ll check out HoL. I think you’re in for a real treat. Personally, I love watching people’s faces when they open the book for the first time. Even as simply an object, the book works as a fascinating conversation piece.

    Evan: Enjoy the books. Even outside of “Best New Horror”, 20th Century Ghosts is loaded with some great short stories. Hill’s novel Heart Shaped Box is also worth reading. It’s strange that I’ve never read another Simmons book. I saw a copy of The Terror here; now I think I need to check it out. Thanks.

    Matt: I know someone who freaked out over the description of the stripper (Bambi, I think she was), the one with the puppy. And I know what you mean about really considering the depths of the house…just like the book itself, it feels endless.

  7. Matt Gamble says:

    Simmons’ Hyperion books are interesting reads. Though they are his only works I have ever read.

    BTW Christian, I’ve been meaning to ask you what you thought of Only Revolutions.

  8. Christian Dumais says:

    I love the idea of Only Revolutions, but I can’t say that I enjoyed it. There are some pages that are beautiful though. I really love these kinds of experimentations; however, at the end of the day, I still want a good story I can hold on to. While I appreciate OR for what it is, I wouldn’t recommend it.

    I’ve been trying to get a copy of Danielewski’s The 50 Year Sword, which was published in Belgium, I believe. It had a very small print run, so copies are generally expensive.

  9. Matt Gamble says:

    I agree on loving the idea of it. The story didn’t flow very well, and trying to read chapters from opposing perspectives ended up being more frustrating then anything. I never felt caught up in the story, as the whole excercise seemed more like work then joy.

  10. Derek Handley says:

    “The Jaunt” and “Mrs. Todd’s Shortcut” are two of my favorite short stories of all time. They’re among Stephen King’s best: effective ideas, realized well, with a gut-churning unease left behind. I remember writing whole stories set in those worlds after reading them.

    My biggest scare with “House of Leaves” was due to the back cover. I was halfway through the book. I’d been reading it for a couple of hours, on my own in the house, and it was getting darker outside. I closed the book for a moment, glanced at the back cover, and dropped the book with a start: there was an image I’d never noticed before in the bottom right-hand corner of the cover. I’d always thought it was plain black, but no, there was something there. It really unnerved me. Of course it was really just an expression of the effect the book as a whole was having, but it was that little grey-scale image that stuck in my mind.

    Great column, as always.

  11. Jessi says:

    “Jaunt” was my favorite story from that book. It actually gave me nightmares wondering what the boy saw. I’ve been meaning to read House of Leaves since my friend mentioned it a while back. Thanks for posting this list!

  12. Christian Dumais says:

    I’m happy to see all the love for “The Jaunt”.

    It’s funny how King is known for his verbosity, but some of his best works are his short stories. “Last Rung on the Ladder” is devastating. “Mrs. Todd’s Shortcut” is extremely clever. “1408″ is scary (I forgot to mention this on my list, now that I think about it). And “Crouch End” is a great love letter to Lovecraft.

  13. Matt Gamble says:

    He has a ton of great novellas as well. I really think those smaller works force King to be more focused, and it inevitably results in a better story. The guy is a great writer, but man he can just go off on pointless tangents.

  14. Christian Dumais says:

    All this talk of short fiction has inspired me to devote the next piece to some of the best short stories.

  15. Evan Derrick says:

    Ok, so I got “20th Century Ghosts” from the library and have read a little in it (“House of Leaves,” sadly, is on hold 4 copies back). I really, really, really dug “Best New Horror” up until the very end. I’m with you, Christian, on the subtle effectiveness of the story within the story. He doesn’t write it out, word for word, but his recapping of it does leave you somewhat uneasy. And that unease builds as the editor seeks out the true author. However, at the end, it strays off in a completely different direction, and while I can appreciate the meta-ness of the direction he went it, it felt like an ending to an entirely different story. The unease that had been built up just kind of deflates.

    Also read “Poster Art,” which is just a beautiful piece of fiction. Fantastical and heartbreaking all at the same time.

  16. Christian Dumais says:

    Evan: I understand what you mean about the story’s ending, but structurally it works – the protagonist has clearly changed by the ending of the story. I like how the story attracts him enough to seek out the author, and how the author – and his environment – is a lumping of several horror concepts, though not enough of one cliche to hold onto; what’s important is that it’s clear something isn’t right about the author. And wonderfully enough, the situation is precisely what the editor has been waiting for.

    In a way, the whole thing reminds me of the fascination of a zombie apocalypse. Everyone seems to have a way of surviving it; everyone knows what they’d do. And it seems that everyone’s waiting for it just so they can make their point.

    Let me know your thoughts about his other stories. There’s one about a drifter who comes to a stranger’s house of breakfast that has one of the best endings of a short story I’ve read in a while.

  17. Evan Derrick says:

    Ok, I can see where you’re coming from Christian, and yes, that makes sense and fits in with the story. In that sense, I think this is a story that will hold up better on a second reading, as the direction the story is truly heading in isn’t necessarily the direction you think it is. When a story/TV show/movie/fill-in-the-blank-with-your-favorite-media offers you a certain expectation but then denies that expectation, your initial reaction can be one of annoyance, frustration, or even anger. Over time, you can come to appreciate such a story even more or end up hating it even more strongly. This story, I think, is likely the former.

  18. fuckall says:

    you’re a cunt. shall we regale another boring blAgger who essentially says nothing new about anything? i wish i had a a knife gun and the advantage of close proximity. sadly, the tubes have left me with this,

    a giant female hygienic product.

    and, no, that is not a compliment.

  19. Matt Gamble says:

    Radtke?

  20. Christian Dumais says:

    That was fantastic.

  21. Matt Gamble says:

    I must agree that we need more knife guns around here, though I have yet to be swayed by the argument of a need for more giant female hygenic products. That implies giant women, which would only serve to frighten and confuse me.

  22. Christian Dumais says:

    Well, I just think it’s an honor to be threatened with an imaginary weapon.

    I accept your knife gun, Mr/Mrs fuckall, and I counter-attack with my Axe Cannon.

  23. Walt says:

    Well I had high hopes for House of Leaves when I read it first but it didn’t keep me like it should have. The story itself was great even though it lost its way about 3/4 of the way through. The sub stories / journal entries, although innovative, really distracted me from the main plot line. I walked away from the house of leaves feeling like I lost too much of my free time reading something that didn’t have any answers except Why did I pay for this book? The main plot is too short and really leaves you wanting more. I really wanted to like this book but it did not do it for me. I keep saying I am going to try it again but when I think about the sub stories I get ill. Sorry to disagree.

  24. Christian Dumais says:

    Walt: Thanks for sharing your thoughts on HoL. It’s not a book for everyone, and I’ll admit, it took me a couple of reads before I felt I had a grasp of the book’s bigger picture. I think to truly enjoy the book is to let go of what our narrative expectations and to let run with the distractions from the plot. On one level, they are meant to get the reader as lost as the characters are in the house, so that the reader is struggling within his/her own “house of leaves”; however, on the other level, they present the reader with puzzles with solutions that completely change the book. For instance, if you look for it, you’ll find a direct connection to Zampano and Truant’s mother that opens the book to a completely new interpetation.

    Anyway, it’s cool that you gave the book a chance. Most people I know, after flipping through it, put it right back down.

  25. Walt says:

    Christian: I have to say I have never thought that the sub-plots were meant to make me feel as if I was lost in the house. Great point and I think you are spot on. It did it’s job and after writing the above comment I started to think I might give it another shot. There were some truly spectacular moments in the book that had me fearful of shutting the lights. Any insight on how, maybe, I should go about reading it would be much appreciated. I was not sure if each plot was read completely through would they flow better? Thanks again for the insight and thanks for the great reviews. Because of this site I went and bought Song of Kali.

  26. Christian Dumais says:

    Walt: I’ve heard a few different ways for people to tackle the book. Personally, I read the main story, follow the footnotes as far as they take me, and then return to the main story. I know at one point, it’s advised to jump back to Pelafina’s letters in the back, and I’d recommend doing so before going on with the story. I know people who have read the main story without the footnotes, and then at a later date read only the footnotes. I liken the book to a complicated video game, where there are multiple ways to win, and you are guaranteed a different experience when you return to it. With that said, this is one of the most carefully crafted books I’ve ever read; Danielewski really knew what he was doing, and nearly everything has a point.

    Let me know what you think of Song of Kali. I re-read one particular scene (you’ll know it when you read it) the other week and was pleasantly surprised how it holds up.

  27. online payday advance says:

    I think Stephen King is amazing at all his books. I also love how he makes a movie for all of them, and how everything is so scary. I think Pet Cemetary will always be my favorite.

Leave a Reply

borrow money online
secured loans
house cover
buy to let mortgage